Time to move the fences in at Safeco Field

  Today is an off day for the Mariners as we await the start of a home stand featuring the Reds and Cubs. Jack Z. has stated he is not throwing in the towel just yet and wants to see what happens in these games. Fair enough however should things not go as planned and we begin the next round of rebuilding the Mariners,  I would like to propose that we move in the fences before next season starts. As we all know Safeco Field is considered a pitcher-friendly ballpark. In addition to the heavy moisture laden air, the fences as you can see on the left are deep. In order to entice a real Power Hitter to come to play for the Mariners it may help if we make it a little easier to actually hit 30-40 homers here. I have done a little research into the official rules for Major League Baseball and found the following under rule 1.04 The Playing Field : a) Any Playing Field constructed by a professional club after June 1, 1958, shall provide a minimum distance of 325 feet from home base to the nearest fence, stand or other obstruction on the right and left field foul lines, and a minimum distance of 400 feet to the center field fence.

     b) No existing playing field shall be remodeled after June 1, 1958, in such a manner as to reduce the distance from home base to the foul poles and to the center field fence below the minimum specified in paragraph (a) above.

   So there you have it, we can indeed move in the fences as long as we follow the parameters contained in the above rules. I suggest we move dead-center into 400 feet and the left field foul pole into 325. This will enable the Mariners to take 8-10 feet out of the no-mans land in left center as well as moving in the fence in right center a little as well. The Mariners fans  like fans everywhere love the home run, it is probably the most exciting aspect of the game of baseball. Yes I know bringing in the fences applies to both teams and the advantage is not strictly in favor of the home team, but the current mind-set of building a team around pitching and defense has proven to be a bust. Maybe I’m alone on this idea but I figure if we are going rebuild let’s do it right and start with the things we can control.

    Now I’m sure Howard Lincoln and Chuck Armstrong will say it costs too much. My response is that  this project will probably cost about half as much as we spent on Ian Snell’s salary to date. And since we most likely won’t be playing much ball in October, we could start drawing up the plans after the Cubs leave town and begin construction on October 4th. That is unless someone happens to be getting married in the bullpen that day…. http://jeffsmariners.com

Comments

  1. says

    I was initially excited that Safeco was built as a pitcher’s park (I was a pitcher/love pitcher’s duels more than anything), but I’m afraid you’re right: Outside of the Steroid Era, Safeco Field has been a disaster for our offense.

    The funny thing is, if you have a good pitching staff, it almost makes sense to bring the fences in—arguably your pitchers would be better equipped to dispatch of opposing hitters who might take advantage of the smaller dimensions. It sure hasn’t seemed to bother Boston pitchers since about, oh, 2003.

    And hey, ideal situation: Closer fences > more home runs > more wins > more tickets sold > install more seats.

  2. says

    Paul, Great comment. I like your thinking in regards to good pitchers would still be fine in a smaller park, because well they are good pitchers! Also never thought about the added revenue from adding more seats, great angle. Hard to say if the Mariners will ever consider something as simple and basic as this, but I’m going to keep bringing it up for the rest of the year. May need to put together an online petition or something hmmmmm,jeff

  3. Bryan says

    i like this idea a lot. i just wish there was some data so we could figure out how many more home runs would of been hit.

    • says

      Bryan, Thanks for the reply. There really is no way of knowing how many homers Safeco field has prevented from going out. There was always speculation that Willie Mays would have caught Ruth if he wasn’t playing at windy Candlestick. Change needs to happen and this is an easy place to start….Jeff

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>